Cases in texmacs pdf#
Cases in texmacs update#
Cases in texmacs code#

That in one copy the *bold* fonts (and only those) are a tiny bit Installations of TeXmacs 1.0.7.10 that work exactly the same, except 'Magnification' you are in trouble, since TeXmacs willĭisplay 11pt font size, but it won't be 11pt in print.Ĭonsistency: I do not know how exactly, but I managed to get two Submit an 11pt document and accidentally mess with the This is very easy toĬonfuse with View > Shrinking factor. Which should at least issue a warning that it changes the FONT SIZE, This issue alone cost me 15 hours of re-breaking the wholeĭocument > Magnification: This is a similarly dangerous item, Prominent 'Page setup' menu, change the size there, andĪssume that it did the trick, when all that is changed is the print Such things sound like minor issues, but anyone will FIRST find the Under File > Page Setup and under Document > Page > Size.Īt the least, the menu should be called 'Print setup'. Page Setup: There are two places where the page size can be set: tm files at all, hide them byĭefault, or at least issue a warning when the user tries to open Unfortunate setting may mean that you lose all of your work. Option to restrict it to TeXmacs files, e.g.tm +. 'Open'?) dialog shows all file types (in fact there is no Tm Files: By default, the 'File > Load' (BTW, why not Indicator/warning if there are any undefined references or

Cases in texmacs pdf#

The PDF to check if there are any undefined reference.

TeXmacs to regenerate everything, and searched for '?' in This canĬreate very hard-to-spot errors in your document. Times), while it should display '?' instead.

Cases in texmacs update#

Is unchanged (even after Document > Update > All, multiple I loosely ordered the items in order of descendingĭeleted references: TeXmacs indefinitely remembers references it has Getting used to, and performance issues that are relevant when editing Things than can ruin the output by silently introducing errors,Īnnoying things that are just counter-intuitive or take a lot of time It is organized in three parts: dangerous Large documents), and to get the stylesheet language as solid and as

Cases in texmacs code#

The existing code as stable and fast as possible (in particular for To the list below, I think that the upmost priority should be to get Scientific editor, but long-term usability is just bad. Innovative features and flexibility by now to beat any other In my opinion TeXmacs has more than enough Very frustrating having to deal with mysterious crashes and figuringĬurrently it seems that new features are added all the time, such as Which I know that it is hard to get used to, but it is stable. With hindsight, I have to say that had I knownĪll the problems I have encountered, I had probably chosen LaTeX, from Is easy to get used to, but extremely crashy when trying to do While LaTeX needs a huge amount of work in order to get anĪcceptable workflow, when correctly set up it is rock solid.

Provides a solid stable foundation that users and publishers canĭepend on. However, I think TeXmacs can only compete with LaTeX if it Path, and so that maybe Joris (or someone else who knows the sources)ĭon't get me wrong, I like TeXmacs, and it works very well for smallĭocuments. That I thought I'd share them, in case anyone wants to take a similar I found myself developing so many workaround However, this time I chose to use TeXmacs from theīeginning to the end. Regularly used TeXmacs for the 'draft' phase of variousĭocuments (for which it really shines), and used LaTeX for the final I have been using TeXmacs for several years now, and until now The project has about 200 pages and 40įloats. In general due to the sparsity of developer resources it would be better to concentrate on a few products (I would say Jupyter and Pluto) than forking if there is a way to avoid it.I just finished a major project (thesis) using TeXmacs, and I wanted This would allow the users to re-order them if needed. GitHub so that pressing Ctrl shows the execution order for all cells.One idea would be to extend Jump to definition by pankgeorg The information however is already in the frontend ( ). in Pluto is already possible, but there are no tools available for bringing the cells into execution order. Reactive notebooks where cell order in the notebook does not matter.This is the request of if I understand it correctly. Reactive notebooks, where cells must be in execution order.Technically, cell order does not matter but practically cells should be in execution order (or the latter be explicitly documented) so that notebooks are reproducable. No reactivity, cells are executed manually.As a wrapup, there are different types of notebooks w.r.t.